Or so says Paul Kapustka with his list of “Top Ten Net Neutrality Influencers”, on which I do not rank even an honorable mention.
Tip of the hat, however, to friend-of-the-blog and occasional sparring partner Richard Bennett included in the honorable mention slot.
On the plus side, no one will care if I take Wednesday and Friday off.
Stay tuned . . . .
@POTUS @NTIAgov And congratulations to @JRosenworcel and @gigibsohn - two terrific public servants - on their historic FCC appointments. I look forward to working closely with them both.
.@haroldfeld: noting that the FCC hasn't looked at power in the home since 2015. Phones aren't self-powered, so you can't use your landline during an outage.
@haroldfeld: The @FCC should look at how ATSC 3.0 spectrum can be used during outages. We have redundancy --- let's take advantage of it!
Running problem is an understatement. I’ve heard multiple stories of broadcasters being shut out of state-level conversations as well. https://twitter.com/haroldfeld/status/1453022544714416135
Broadcasters not included in industry partners list. This is a running problem that FEMA and disaster responders generally don't think about communications. #FCCLive
Supply chain issues impacting deployment infrastructure, according to witnesses at #FCCLive public safety hearing.
I told Paul that my inclusion on his list undermines its credibility. I think you know you hold more sway on this issue than I ever will, and you’re on the winning side to boot.
Let us resolve it by joining each other’s fan clubs.
I hear Kevin Martin is the president of yours. Maybe he’ll comment.
Don’t feel so bad. Paul posted it on Muniwireless and he did not mention me at all.
When I get the call to appear on “Dancing with the Stars,” I’ll put in a good word for you, Esme.
Hey, just like any good policy maker I can be swayed by contributions… for the next rev!
The list is so appended… Howard is now honorably mentioned as well. I apologize for the omission!
Howard!
Oh, the ignominy!
jrs
d’oh! Can’t even get a correction correckt. (It’s correct on the web page, though.)