Or so says Paul Kapustka with his list of “Top Ten Net Neutrality Influencers”, on which I do not rank even an honorable mention.
Tip of the hat, however, to friend-of-the-blog and occasional sparring partner Richard Bennett included in the honorable mention slot.
On the plus side, no one will care if I take Wednesday and Friday off.
Stay tuned . . . .
@haroldfeld @AjitPaiFCC #Verizon had to be FORCED to repair its network when it pulled the same stunt.
“... settlement requires Verizon to replace bad cable, defective equipment, and faulty back-up batteries”
https://t.co/omBbDDKQ5w
Oh, if only some intrepid band of public interest groups were suing the @FCC for repealing the rule that prevented Frontier from pulling crap like this! Oh yeah. We filed our reply brief yesterday.
Oh, if only there were a rule for when a carrier de facto retires its copper lines by refusing to repair them. Oh wait, there WAS! Perhaps @AjitPaiFCC would like to explain what happened to it.
https://t.co/LISCWgM7xU
Despite all of @AjitPaiFCC deregulation, which last year's 706 Report claimed would spur broadband to rural, Frontier won't even repair its own networks.
https://t.co/LISCWgM7xU
Julian Edelman knew how to stoke Brady's fire during the AFC Championship game: scream at him “You’re too f****** old!” https://t.co/dhu4UU85rt
I told Paul that my inclusion on his list undermines its credibility. I think you know you hold more sway on this issue than I ever will, and you’re on the winning side to boot.
Let us resolve it by joining each other’s fan clubs.
I hear Kevin Martin is the president of yours. Maybe he’ll comment.
Don’t feel so bad. Paul posted it on Muniwireless and he did not mention me at all.
When I get the call to appear on “Dancing with the Stars,” I’ll put in a good word for you, Esme.
Hey, just like any good policy maker I can be swayed by contributions… for the next rev!
The list is so appended… Howard is now honorably mentioned as well. I apologize for the omission!
Howard!
Oh, the ignominy!
jrs
d’oh! Can’t even get a correction correckt. (It’s correct on the web page, though.)