Dogbark Master had this “deep thought” up today:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I know I’ve heard that before. It’s right on the tip of my tongue. . .
Good, but much too arcane a reference. After all, who the hell (besides elitists) know who either of those assholes (Alito, Calhoun) are, or were. I'd go with the "Joseph Goebbels of Heinrich Himmlers." Similarly arcane, obviously slanderous, but probably more accurate.
Mitch McConnell is the Samuel Alito of John C. Calhouns.
A good, sobering, & on 1st, quick reading, level-headed article. In the paragraph below, I applaud the use of the word "brandishing," so seldom used by major newspapers, & the quotes around "protect". But why no quotation marks around the word "militia"? https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/24/coronavirus-rural-america-outbreaks/
If any of you mofos were to feel like retweeting this (or any of my other, similar, respectfully infrequent, self-promotional tweets); if it's not too much of an *inconvenience*, if it's not too *big* of an *ask*, I would motherfuckingly appreciate it.
How to tell if you're in a Sundman novel:
You are in a maze of twisty passages, each one different.
The walls are made of biological & digital technologies, angst, sex, memories of Africa, ethical conundrums. There is a scary meta-monster. Also, Jesus.
You are in a twisty maze.
