Dogbark Master had this “deep thought” up today: 
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I know I’ve heard that before. It’s right on the tip of my tongue. . .
Related Posts:
- Why Canada's C-18 Isn't Working Out As Expected.  by Harold  July 24, 2023  Back at the end of June, Canada passed C-18, aka "The Online News Act," a law designed to make Google and Facebook negotiate with news…
- My Insanely Long Field Guide to the Fox29 Philadelphia (WTFX-TV) License Renewal Challenge.  by Harold  August 29, 2023  In July, the Media and Democracy Project filed a Petition to Deny the license renewal of Fox29 (WTFX-TV) in Philadelphia. The Petition rests on a…
- S. Korea "Sender Pays" Is a Warning, Not a Model, or Why (Almost) Everyone Keeps Telling the EU This Is a VERY Bad Idea.  by Harold  October 14, 2022  Economist/NYT opinion writer Paul Krugman coined the term "Zombie idea" to describe an idea that, despite being repeatedly refuted with evidence, keeps coming back. Not…
- AI Policy and the Uncanny Valley Freakout.  by Harold  June 30, 2023  We have been debating, on and off, about the issues around artificial intelligence and AI governance for some time now. Here at Public Knowledge, we…
- What is the FCC's Role in Artificial Intelligence?  by Harold  July 17, 2023  There are two types of public events here in DC. Those designed to actually educate people and those designed so that folks can display their…
- The Elijah Moment  by Harold  November 6, 2024  Back in 2009, after a bad loss in Maine for same sex marriage which folks expected to win, I wrote about what I call "The…