The dickwads at the Associated Press

A bunch of stupid bullies who don’t understand the concepts of “fair use” and “internet” (or more likely, understand them very well but don’t like them), think they have enough clout to dictate terms. Well, the millions and millions and billions of Wetmachine readers will have to find their own way to AP stories from now on. I’m not going to link to them. Take that, you wankers!

We Need To Fix Media, Not Just Social Media -- Part III by Harold November 28, 2018 This is part of a continuing series of mine on platform regulation published by my employer, Public Knowledge. You can find the whole series here. You can find…
So What The Heck *IS* A Digital Platform? by Harold July 18, 2018 This is the second blog in a series on regulating digital platforms. A (less snaky) version first appeared on the blog of my employer, Public…
My Insanely Long Field Guide To The C-Band Spectrum Fight, And Why This Won't End In December. by Harold November 13, 2019 Like most everything else at the FCC these days, problems that have relatively simple and straightforward solutions turn into horrible complicated messes. Take the C-Band,…
The Market for Privacy Lemons. Why "The Market" Can't Solve The Privacy Problem Without Regulation. by Harold February 15, 2019 Practically every week, it seems, we get some new revelation about the mishandling of user information that makes people very upset. Indeed, people have become…
We Need To Fix The News Media, Not Just Social Media Part I by Harold August 10, 2018 A substantially similar version of this appeared on the blog of my employer, Public Knowledge. Focusing blame Google and Facebook for the decline of in-depth…
7 Reasons Why The AT&T/TW Trial Matters So Much The Future of Antitrust (+1 for Appeal). by Harold March 19, 2018 Starting this week, AT&T and Time Warner get their day in court to prove that their proposed merger does not violate the anti-trust laws. I…

4 Comments

JohgMc
June 14, 2008 at 12:39 pm

As Open Source Journalism continues to grow, the shoe will be on the other foot in about 10 years. Then when AP wants to source a story from some video blog they will get sued. Which by the way Michael Yon did that very thing against Reuters.
John
June 14, 2008 at 12:46 pm

As I understand things, AP was people who quoted a few sentences and then linked to the AP site.

I’ve seen a bunch of people who have been extremely liberal in their interpretation of “fair use” with respect to some Wetmachine articles from time to time. It would be more annoying if a giant concern like AP did it. But if AP wants to quote a few sentences from a Wetmachine article and include a link to the original, that’s fine by me. That’s the whole idea of the web, for Pete’s sake.
Stearns
June 14, 2008 at 5:06 pm

I don’t think we should boycott: I think every blogger should link to as many AP stories as possible! Maybe write a little script to generate the links automatically. Put up an RSS aggregation. Quote like hell.

Make them pay a fortune for unproductive legal action. And after bloggers jointly raise their AP’s Page Rank in Google, how are they going to claim damages?
Harold
June 16, 2008 at 5:16 pm

Yes, I agree that it is a much better form of social protest to link like crazy than to boycott links. Stick it to them!

Comments are closed

The dickwads at the Associated Press

Related Posts:

4 Comments

John’s Tweets