It is interesting to compare Intel’s participation in Croquet vs. the One Laptop Per Child project (OLPC).
Intel is a corporate member of the Croquet consortium, along with HP and Qwaq. Intel’s CEO Justin Rattner demonstrated Croquet-based Qwaq Forums during his keynote at the big Intel Developers Forum, and they are building a joint product with Qwaq. This all makes complete sense for Intel. For example, this week the market research pundits at Forrester released a report that says the 3D Internet will be ubiquitous in business in the next few years and that Information & Knowledge specialists should get started now with Qwaq. But there’s an even deeper fit specifically for Intel, which does not apply to OLPC.
Intel has made a lot of money, and relatively high margins, on the Windows-Intel platform. A couple of years ago, Apple replaced the IBM-based PowerPC chip with Intel for its new line of high-margin Macs, becoming a huge seller in the deal. The classic move for Intel now is to not try to compete in a price war at the bottom of the market, but to keep moving up-market with ever more-powerful processors. Alas, today’s processors are way more than adequate for today’s Windows and Mac applications, particularly for business applications. The smart move is to encourage a new class of applications that can push the demand for processing upwards. No wonder then, that Rattner’s keynote for future directions was all about the 3D Internet.
By contrast, the key to OLPC’s educational plans is to deploy zillions of low-cost non-Win-tel boxes. Gandhi said, “First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win.” I’m not sure why Intel didn’t stop at the fist step, as it doesn’t fit Intel’s best plans. But instead they ridiculed it. Then they tried to take it over by joining the board and pushing for a new Intel-based design. (Intel’s press release, still cached by Google, has now disappeared.) They also joined with Microsoft’s efforts to dump zillions of below-cost Win-tel boxes (e.g., some as low as a $1/per) to stamp out OLPC’s designed-for-the-problem box. But Intel’s next promised payment was due to OLPC, so I guess it was time to pull out.
I don’t think that a successful OLPC is really going to hurt Intel, and I think Intel is doing the right thing with their Croquet support. Like Henry Ford paying his workers enough to buy model Ts, my guess is that OLPC will simply create a larger market for creating and using what will eventually be a 3D Internet market owned in-part by Intel.
Related Posts:
- What the Eff, FAA? My Insanely Long Field Guide to the FAA/FCC 5G C-Band Fight. by Harold November 8, 2021 5G has been accused a lot of ridiculous things -- causing Covid, causing cancer, causing autism. This article provides a list of 9 separate conspiracy…
- Get Ready for the 2022 Season of Spectrum Wars! by Harold March 15, 2022 It isn't the sultry Regency drama of Bridgerton, the action psycho-drama of Moon Knight, or even the, um, whatever the heck Human Resources is. But…
- We Can #ConnectTribes to Broadband, and YOU Can Help! by Harold July 22, 2020 One of the unusual plot twists of this season on Spectrum Wars has been my agreeing more and more with FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. For…
- Auctioning a Chunk of 6 GHz Would be Phenomenally Bad Policy. by Harold March 4, 2020 Spectrum has once again become a hot topic in telecom. And in what is perhaps the oddest twist in this season's telenovela Spectrum Wars is…
- Breaking Down and Taking Down Trump's Executive Order Spanking Social Media. by Harold June 4, 2020 (A substantially similar version of this appeared first on the blog of my employer, Public Knowledge) It's hard to believe Trump issued this stupid Executive…
- S. Korea "Sender Pays" Is a Warning, Not a Model, or Why (Almost) Everyone Keeps Telling the EU This Is a VERY Bad Idea. by Harold October 14, 2022 Economist/NYT opinion writer Paul Krugman coined the term "Zombie idea" to describe an idea that, despite being repeatedly refuted with evidence, keeps coming back. Not…
About Stearns
Howard Stearns works at High Fidelity, Inc., creating the metaverse.
Mr. Stearns has a quarter century experience in systems engineering, applications consulting, and management of advanced software technologies. He was the technical lead of University of Wisconsin's Croquet project, an ambitious project convened by computing pioneer Alan Kay to transform collaboration through 3D graphics and real-time, persistent shared spaces. The CAD integration products Mr. Stearns created for expert system pioneer ICAD set the market standard through IPO and acquisition by Oracle. The embedded systems he wrote helped transform the industrial diamond market. In the early 2000s, Mr. Stearns was named Technology Strategist for Curl, the only startup founded by WWW pioneer Tim Berners-Lee. An expert on programming languages and operating systems, Mr. Stearns created the Eclipse commercial Common Lisp programming implementation.
Mr. Stearns has two degrees from M.I.T., and has directed family businesses in early childhood education and publishing.