A quick hit now as I dig my way out on my return from vacation.
For anyone interested in commenting on the fight between Continental, Logan and its wider implications for users of non-exclusive wireless, the FCC has extended the deadline for comments. Comments now due September 28 and replies due October 13 (conflicting with Yom Kippur).
Stay tuned . . .
I wrote a white paper! 🥳🥳🥳 If you’re even slightly interested in learning about spectrum policy this is the paper for you. It’s basically a 101 on the key issues in spectrum policy and how even technical spectrum policies can have profound impacts on the public. https://twitter.com/publicknowledge/status/1618621169749610502
In the words of Doc Brown, "the future is what you make it." @katmburke's new paper explores what we can learn from the SPTF's report and how policymakers can move towards a brighter wireless future. Read here! http://publicknowledge.org/back2spectrum
Washpo is not alone in this. Not only is it media virtue signaling ("see, we are not left leaning"), is also important to throw cold water on success of more progressive economic policies.
The Washington Post always puts a negative spin on good news for the Biden economy. See: https://presswatchers.org/2022/01/which-newsrooms-are-trying-to-make-the-economy-look-bad/ And maybe this is why: https://presswatchers.org/2022/10/the-washington-post-has-a-bezos-problem/
My @publicknowledge colleague @katmburke released a major new #spectrum white paper today: Back to the Spectrum Future, 20th Anniversary of the Spectrum Policy Task Force.
https://publicknowledge.org/policy/back-to-the-spectrum-future-the-20th-anniversary-of-the-spectrum-policy-task-force/
Blog post: https://publicknowledge.org/back-to-the-spectrum-future-how-a-public-interest-framework-can-create-a-wireless-future-that-benefits-us-all/
Why is this a big deal? I'll explain. /1
