If we wanted a Republican, don’t you think we would have voted for one?
As Atrios says, we are so screwed.
Related Posts:
- The Market for Privacy Lemons. Why "The Market" Can't Solve The Privacy Problem Without Regulation. by Harold February 15, 2019 Practically every week, it seems, we get some new revelation about the mishandling of user information that makes people very upset. Indeed, people have become…
- 7 Reasons Why The AT&T/TW Trial Matters So Much The Future of Antitrust (+1 for Appeal). by Harold March 19, 2018 Starting this week, AT&T and Time Warner get their day in court to prove that their proposed merger does not violate the anti-trust laws. I…
- Verizon California Throttling Mistake Shows How Radical Pai's Repeal Order Really Was. by Harold August 28, 2018 Congress created the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in order to ensure we would have working communications infrastructure for, among other things, handling public safety. It…
- My Insanely Long Field Guide To The C-Band Spectrum Fight, And Why This Won't End In December. by Harold November 13, 2019 Like most everything else at the FCC these days, problems that have relatively simple and straightforward solutions turn into horrible complicated messes. Take the C-Band,…
- Auctioning a Chunk of 6 GHz Would be Phenomenally Bad Policy. by Harold March 4, 2020 Spectrum has once again become a hot topic in telecom. And in what is perhaps the oddest twist in this season's telenovela Spectrum Wars is…
- What You Need To Know About Repealing The Repeal of Net Neutrality -- How The CRA Works. by Harold January 18, 2018 There is a great deal of excitement, but also a great deal of misunderstanding, about the effort to "repeal the repeal" of net neutrality using…
Well I have a better one for you.
If you have a mortgage that was created in the last 7-8 years your note maybe part of a toxic asset pool even though you pay it timely. Such is the nature of secularized mortgage instruments.
So the deal is to offer xx¢ on the dollar for essentially your mortgage to investors. Lets say its 60c/$1. So a guy like Buffet comes in and buys up these assets and hopes for maybe 75c/$1 return.
My question is if somebody like Buffet can come in and untangle the mess. Then why can’t a Trust Public Corp do the same? Then turn around to the original mortgage holders and offer 75c/$1 for them to refinance their home at a lower capital basis. It lowers the cost to the homeowner, it bails out the banks somewhat so their balance sheet improves. The security holders other than say the AA tranch was never going to be made whole anyway.
2 out of 3 winners ain’t a bad deal.